Heat pumps are quite different. If you can handle the air-to-air pump, it would be less than the in

Up
Gas has all the comforts and if there is a joining of the heating system when the construction is cheap and easy. The price of gas is a bit problematic, because it is cheaper for direct electric alisa verner heater, but if the construction cost of the heat pump kiikse neglected it a bit more expensive than the heat pump. Soojuspumpasi a wide range, unfortunately, the questioner did not specify the available options. alisa verner So do not particularly bothered to talk about everything. The cheapest price is building air-to-air alisa verner pumps (less expensive to build than gas). Their kiikse others less heat pumps. alisa verner The main problem is a cop and a power failure in temperatures well below freezing, ie, -15 degrees at the pump is not worth the work but you need to keep the heat in either a gas or otherwise. Another possible noise pumping costs. The third is the air circulation in the room. And they can not do tap water. Of these, a free air-to-water and water-water pumps, but their price? If gas is available then it is worth joining the both put. Gas Appliance buy water heating radiator, and put only one of which is usually out of service. Otherwise, the bustling heat pump. If the gas is not joining you do not pay for gas appliances to invest more.
Heat pumps are quite different. If you can handle the air-to-air pump, it would be less than the initial investment. However, the need for cold winter nights anyway additional alisa verner heating. When compared to the air-to-water heat pump and gas boiler, gas boiler, it is cheaper to own. However, it may happen that you pay the difference of gas charged over it. Heat pump is still cold winter evening require additional heat (usually resolved tennidega). GSHP - higher initial investment while additional heating is not needed. In general, the lower the cost of the heat pump for heating of the gas for heating. Air source heat pump is a heavy frost, though more expensive (because basically used for electrical heating), but without alisa verner the harder we have quite a few (depending on the location - Kärdla and Jõgeva is quite different). 100m2 house is currently of a size which should look very carefully alginvesteeeringu size. A well-insulated house, the monthly heating costs are relatively low. Gas heating for quite conclusive - that pays affiliation (if not already). When joining the gas is already available, alisa verner it is quite reasonable solution to the gas boiler. Itself was just such a stand - joining the existing gas and decided alisa verner in favor. True, it was almost four years ago, when gas prices were much lower (in the same heat pumps prices and mystical parameters). In addition, it seems that the gas boiler is also a foolproof solution to (have not heard complaining about "do not overheat the house warm," etc.).
At one time, wrote these posts ve? Air-to-water heat pump, or you want to GSHPs. Pneumatic air is not the main heating. Eg. experience alisa verner in his pocket to take. Two identical houses. Both of 350m2 and a lot of glass surfaces. Ground source heat pumps in 2005 or 2006 in February 3200.- EUR bill, the gas in the second house of 11 400.- EUR. I repeat, that the houses are large and very large glass surfaces, as well as the cold months.
I could so your post to begin writing before Kalvi was going to own your own upload 350m2 is ~ 2 times more than I do (160m2 heated area), while even last winter, when the gas is already much more expensive was, did not reach the gas bill never more than 3000 euros . Another thing - 350 vs 100m2 - this is a very important difference alisa verner between the heating needs (at least when both are more or less insulated). This is precisely the reason why I was placed in a GSHP in this case rather than the "expensive" category. The initial investment is too large and the recoupment time goes on too long period of time. Pmst however, depends very much on direct heat requirement - if it is very well insulated alisa verner house, then it might be cheaper to put on quite a few of the most elektriradikat. Initial investment is insignificant, while the monthly heating costs are still low (400 kroons to win 50% of the heating bill at a slight 1-2K per year). As a bonus, very simply and accurately controlled heating system.
Comparison based on 180 m2 of living, the annual energy demand of 34 000 kW gaas.ee: - 1 m3 = 9 kWh - Annual Cost = 34000/9 = 3777 m3 - m3 price of 6 (provided 750+ m3 per year) - the annual cost of 22,600 ( does not take into account the efficiency of the burner, it should probably be 90+). maapump: data: http://www.ekvy.ee/images/Maasoojuspumb ... iivsus.pdf - an annual average alisa verner of 3.6 SCOP (NIBE 1120-10) alisa verner - the cost of electricity per year to 34 000 / 3.6 = 9444 kWh - the price of electricity (home 4, 25A) 12 800 EEK (not too accurate because üldelektri calculating amps price decreases) On reflection, concrete pump concrete alisa verner results page ekvy year period soojusväljundiks / 16 000 kWh of energy of the house, which is a relative small number of pump 10kW about. It helps maakontuuril stay warmer, and thus keep the COP high. Perhaps, then, the annual consumption of 34,000 kW of SCOP is definitely lower.
Do not forget it, where the gas will be. Russia sells him here now much cheaper than in Germany, alisa verner and it is not because the Estonians alisa verner an eerily meeldivad.Vastupidi, he would sell it much more than the Germans, but is limited to the current pipeline capacity. I predict that if the Baltic Sea after